The Case for Condorcet Elections
How election reform can eliminate spoilers, promote third party efforts, and clarify the meaning of democracy.  
Home PurposeThe motivation of this site: the necessity and practicality of a new election system for a changing world. Election TheoryThe basic axioms of what we should desire in an election, and descriptions of several methods that attempt to address these. Why Condorcet?Argument for why Condorcet is the optimal system which we should strive to implement. PracticalityHow electronic methods make Condorcet practical, secure, and desirable. Links/ContactSite credits, contact information, and links to other resources. GlossaryGlossary of specific terms used throughout the site.
About this site Similar Sites Additional Links Contact

Additional Links

The pages listed below contain information about related topics. These are mostly not affiliated with election methods, but rather with election implementation. We have provided that information which we feel is most relevant on our own site, but we provide these links for those who desire more information about the risks and benefits of electronic voting.

Verified Voting Foundation

The Verified Voting Foundation is a nonprofit organization created by David Dill, Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University. It exists to warn the public of the dangers of strictly electronic voting, and proposed the ways in which such implementations can be combined with most secure, paper-trail based systems.
verifiedvoting.org: An affiliated website describing the efforts and successes of implementing paper trail systems in the United States.
Resolution on Electronic Voting: A resolution, written by David Dill, essentially as a manifesto for the need for verifiable electoral systems. It also has a means for anyone to “endorse” the resolution.

Wikipedia: Electronic Voting

Once again, Wikipedia possesses a fairly admirable article on the history, benefits, and problems of electronic voting, as well as a comprehensive set of links the descriptive sites and advocacy groups.

© 2006 Nathan Pflueger.
This page was last updated 9 June 2006.