|
The Case for Condorcet Elections |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| How election reform can eliminate spoilers, promote third party efforts, and clarify the meaning of democracy. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Electronic ImplementationAn obvious practical concern regarding CondorcetThe general term for any election method that uses ranked ballots and has, as it's first princple, the Condorcet Criterion: any candidate which beats every other candidate individually must win the election. Any Condorcet method must come along with an ambiguity resolution procedure for cases in which there is no winner by this first criterion. elections is how to implement, count, and tabulate the ranked ballotA ballot on which a vote consists in ranking the candidates in order of preference. results. Electronic voting is almost completely necessary to any implementation of ranked ballots, Condorcet or otherwise. However, we believe that in the interest of verifiability, there must exist a paper trail, and the counting process should be as physical as possible. Thus we propose the following solution: electronic voting machines which print legible paper ballots, to be counted by a different electronic machine and then saved for the purpose of a paper trail. The Problem with Ordinary Paper BallotsOrdinary paper ballots (those filled out by hand by the voter) are not a good idea for Condorcet elections.
The Ease of Printed Paper BallotsPrinted paper ballots have all the security of voter-generated ballots, with the following advantages.
Would Everyone Understand the System?One problem is whether such a system would be user-friendly enough for voters of all ages to make sense of it. The instructions on a touch screen can be very simple, but still might confuse the elderly. It would, however, we easy enough to provide alternatives. For those who did not understand the multiple-candidate system, they could simply use the same touch screen to vote for their preferred candidate, and push some “end” button. Their vote would be tallied as ranking that candidate above all the others, with no preference among the remaining candidates. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2006 Nathan Pflueger. This page was last updated 9 June 2006. |