npdl.gif

HomeHome RankingsRankings ConstitutionConstitution Board of TrusteesBoard of Trustees Calendar Calendar Member Map Member Map Gallery Gallery

ForumForum Members Members Login Login Register Register

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.

Current date and time: Apr 2nd, 2026, 9:53pm.


NPDL-PGN
Rankings2005-2006
Rankings
Submit ResultsSubmit Results
How to QualifyHow to Qualify
ConstitutionConstitution
Rules for DebateRules for
Debate
Board of TrusteesBoard of
Trustees
Forum
ForumForum
HelpHelp
Recent PostsRecent Posts
SearchSearch
MembersMembers
Other Resources
Member MapMember Map
CalendarCalendar
GalleryGallery
LoginLogin (Forgot Password?)
Username
Password

Not registered? Do it now!

External Links
IDEAIDEA
NFLNFL
NPDANPDA
NPTENPTE
Net BenefitsNet Benefits
 
Debate Round 2
Topic: This house believes that a weak democracy is superior to a strong dictatorship

Gov: Bailey
Opp: igaboj

Judges: jinrfts and DarthYoshi

   National Parliamentary Debate League
   Summer Tournaments
   Summer 2005 Tournament
(Moderator: Vassar)
   Rd. 2: Bailey [Gov] vs. igaboj [Opp] (Judges: j
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: Rd. 2: Bailey [Gov] vs. igaboj [Opp] (Judges: j  (Read 66 times)
Vassar
Administrator
*****






   
WWW Email

Posts: 327
Real name: Matt Vassar
Location: Stanford, California
School: Freelance Coach and Judge (Unaffiliated)
Re: Rd. 2: Bailey [Gov] vs. igaboj [Opp] (Judges: j
« Reply #15 on: Jul 20th, 2005, 10:44pm »
Report Report Quote Quote Modify Modify

Round complete. Judges should post their ballots ASAP.
IP Logged

Mindlessly pouring hours of my life into coding this board, coding as though the world depended on it...
DarthYoshi
Newbie
*



On that point!

   
Email

Posts: 5
Re: Rd. 2: Bailey [Gov] vs. igaboj [Opp] (Judges: j
« Reply #16 on: Jul 21st, 2005, 9:34am »
Report Report Quote Quote Modify Modify

Before I disclose my decision and the RFD, I do have a few things I want to say...
 
First of all, good round from both Gov and Opp.  Both of you were very structured in your arguments, it made things infinitely easier for me to follow you (since, as we all know, judges are lazy, lazy people Smiley).  
 
Bailey--your definition of democracy could've actually hurt you and limited your ground.  Countries like Britain and France do things much different than we do, but they are most certainly democracies...and strong ones at that (well, maybe not France Smiley).  Just a heads-up there.  Also, in regards to your PMR--do not assume anything about a judge--some judges will not be able to find their head with both hands and a flashlight, much less be able to connect the dots.  Always err on the side of holding the judge's hand.  I was fine with the argumentation as you gave it, but not all judges will.
 
igaboj--bad idea bringing Hitler into your argumentation.  All Bailey would've had to do was say, "Turn: Hitler was a dictator, he killed 12 million people.  Opp uses Hitler as a model dictator, therefore, we can see that strong dictators are mass murderers, vote Gov."  Bailey kinda sorta did that (Bailey, I hope you're reading this, too), but you REALLY left yourself open to a real can of worms for not much in return.  If you want examples of strong dictatorships, minus the genocide, try looking deeper into history--the Pax Romana springs to mind as a less exteme version of dictatorial government.
 
Now for the RFD:
I was very pleased at how both of you managed to narrow down your arguments into their terminal impacts in your rebuttals--again, makes things easier for me.
 
What the round weighed down to was the idea that weak democracy leads to anarchy, while strong dictatorships lead to genocide...which basically meant, would I rather live in an anarchical world or a genocidal world?  Opp does a great job of illustrating the ills of anarchy...but I'm sorry, speed limits and loss of patent and copyright statutes doesn't exactly outweigh loss of life.  While I normally am loathe to vote on genocide (usually due to tenuous link stories), empirics are clearly on the Gov's side--the fact that dictators like Pol Pot committed mass murder was never adequately refuted in the block, and since the loss of life is the be-all, end-all impact, I vote Gov.  
 
To both sides, once again, well done, and if either of you have questions/comments/hate mail, feel free to backchannel me.
IP Logged
DarthYoshi
Newbie
*



On that point!

   
Email

Posts: 5
Re: Rd. 2: Bailey [Gov] vs. igaboj [Opp] (Judges: j
« Reply #17 on: Jul 25th, 2005, 5:53pm »
Report Report Quote Quote Modify Modify

Don't tell me the other judge fell asleep in the middle of the round... Wink
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2  Reply Reply Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Core forum software powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4+ for NPDL!
Heavily modified for NPDL by Matt Vassar
Original forum software copyright © 2000-2006 Yet another Bulletin Board
NPDL web site copyright © 2004-2006 Matt Vassar
National Parliamentary Debate League copyright © 2005-2006 NPDL Board of Trustees
Special thanks to the National Parliamentary Tournament of Excellence for their help in creating our Constitution and Rules.